FAIR biodiversity data in Pensoft journals thanks to a routine data auditing workflow

  • Pensoft Editorial Team
  • Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment
  • March 11, 2019
  •   To avoid publication of openly accessible, yet unusable datasets, fated to result in irreproducible and inoperable biological diversity research at some point down the road, Pensoft takes care for auditing data described in data paper manuscripts upon their submission to applicable journals in the publisher’s portfolio, including Biodiversity Data Journal, ZooKeys, PhytoKeys, MycoKeys and many others. Once the dataset is clean and […]

    Audit finds biodiversity data aggregators ‘lose and confuse’ data

  • Pensoft Editorial Team
  • Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment
  • April 23, 2018
  • In an effort to improve the quality of biodiversity records, the Atlas of Living Australia (ALA) and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) use automated data processing to check individual data items. The records are provided to the ALA and GBIF by museums, herbaria and other biodiversity data sources. However, an independent analysis of such records reports that ALA […]