The Blue Crab Emergency: How a Small Spatial Scale Fueled a Massive Invasion in the Northern Adriatic

The Atlantic blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) continues to spread rapidly in the northern Adriatic Sea.

Guest blog post by Chiara Facca

The Atlantic blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) is ranked among the 100 worst invasive species in the Mediterranean Sea. In the spring and summer of 2023, the Northern Adriatic experienced an unprecedented demographic outbreak of the species. To understand why this explosion happened so quickly and how to manage it, a team of researchers from Ca’ Foscari University of Venice and other Italian institutes set out to study the crab’s biology and ecology. The results have been published in the open-access journal Aquatic Invasions.

From Precaution to Emergency

Left ImageRight Image

Atlantic blue crab (Callinectes sapidus). Images credit to Marco Boschiero.

The continuous spread of the species in the years leading up to our study prompted us to monitor its population, as very little was known about it in our area.

explains Chiara Facca of Ca’ Foscari University of Venice and one of the researchers.

Because the blue crab is a highly versatile predator that targets bivalve mollusks, researchers were deeply concerned about the potential threats to local sectors, particularly traditional small-scale lagoon fisheries and Manila clam farming in the region.

The original goal was to prevent future damage, but right at the start of the study, the crab’s population turned into a real emergency, forcing the team to adapt their research objectives to manage the crisis.

The “Small Scale” Advantage: A Perfect Storm for Proliferation

Map of sampling stations near Chioggia
Map of sampling stations near Chioggia: CHN and CHS (Venice Lagoon), PELL (Adriatic coast), and BR (Brenta River mouth). Credit to Boschiero et al., 2026

One of the most critical discoveries from the research is that these invasive crabs are completing their entire, complex life cycle within an incredibly small area comprising of a spatial gradient of just 2 to 9 kilometers separating riverine, lagoon, and marine habitats.

Why does this matter? In the crab’s native range, such as the Chesapeake Bay in the United States, female blue crabs often have to migrate massive distances, up to 150-200 kilometers, to reach the higher-salinity open sea to spawn. This long migration often forces females to overwinter mid-journey as temperatures drop, significantly extending the time it takes to successfully spawn.

Female blue crab specimen tangled in a net in the Venice Lagoon.
Female blue crab specimen tangled in a net in the Venice Lagoon. Credit to Federico Riccato.

In the Northern Adriatic, the close proximity of the Brenta River, the Venice Lagoon, and the Adriatic Sea allows the reproductive cycle to occur much more rapidly. Because females do not have to undertake long migrations, they avoid the need to overwinter, which likely allows them to spawn eggs two or three times within a single reproductive season. This spatial compression, combined with the crabs’ high fecundity – averaging over 2 million eggs per mass, with peaks reaching nearly 6 million – accelerates the species’ proliferation and makes the population incredibly difficult to control.

A Surprising Discovery at the River Mouth

Blue crab eggs in an early stage of maturation viewed under a stereomicroscope.
Blue crab eggs in an early stage of maturation viewed under a stereomicroscope. Credit to Marco Boschiero.

We were remarkably surprised by the speed at which the species adapted and proliferated across the region. Our findings demonstrate that the Northern Adriatic Sea provides the ideal environmental conditions for this species to thrive.

the team explained.

However, the data revealed a fascinating paradox regarding where the crabs were found versus how healthy they were.

While male crabs were highly abundant at the Brenta River mouth station (an oligohaline, or low salinity, environment), they exhibited a significantly poorer “relative condition factor” (a measure of weight and health) compared to crabs in the lagoon and marine stations. The study suggests this lower condition factor is due to the high energy the crabs must consume for osmoregulation in lower-salinity waters, coupled with a lack of their favorite food source, the bivalve mollusks, which are far more abundant in the nearby coastal and lagoon habitats.

Targeted Management: What Can Be Done?

Blue crab catches tangled in nets in the Venice Lagoon
Blue crab catches tangled in nets in the Venice Lagoon. Credit to Federico Riccato.

Eradicating the Atlantic blue crab is virtually impossible due to its high adaptability, rapid mobility, and ubiquitous distribution across the Mediterranean. However, the researchers emphasize that targeted management strategies are highly feasible.

Blue crab specimens caught with a crab pot.
Blue crab specimens caught with a crab pot. Credit to Marco Boschiero.

Control measures should exploit specific life-history events observed in the study. For instance, the research confirmed that females consistently migrate to higher-salinity marine waters during the spring and summer to spawn. By concentrating harvesting efforts on females during this spawning period at critical geographic bottlenecks, such as lagoon inlets and river mouths, authorities could significantly control population abundance. This targeted approach is essential for mitigating the severe economic impacts on local ecosystems, traditional small-scale fisheries, and clam aquaculture.

Looking Ahead

While this study serves as a critical baseline for understanding the blue crab dynamics in the Northern Adriatic Sea, the research team warns against making assumptions. Many facets of the species’ biology, ecology, and behavior in this invaded range remain unexplored, and these traits may not perfectly mirror those observed in its native habitat or other invaded regions globally. There is still a vast amount of research to be done to fully comprehend and manage this unprecedented ecological phenomenon.

Original source:

Boschiero M, Facca C, Cavraro F, Redolfi Bristol S, Gavioli A, Riccato F, Zucchetta M, Franzoi P (2026) Ecology and biology of Callinectes sapidus in the Northern Adriatic Sea: could the small spatial scale explain its outbreak? Aquatic Invasions 21(1): 49-72. https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2026.21.1.180751 

First national assessment identifies 271 established non-native species in Türkiye, with climate change to accelerate invasiveness risks

271 established non-native species in Turkey with an increased risk of invasiveness under future climate warming scenarios.

A team of researchers, led by Dr. Ali Serhan Tarkan, has published the first nationwide assessment of established non-native species in Türkiye in the journal NeoBiota.

The study identifies 271 species that may pose significant threats to the country’s biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and socio-economic systems, providing a crucial baseline for future conservation and biosecurity efforts.

Using a recent global database of non-native established species, the researchers initially identified 1,092 non-native species within Turkish borders. Through a rigorous review by taxonomic experts, the team filtered out native, cryptogenic, and non-established species, narrowing the focus to 271 confirmed established species.

Invasive freshwater fish (Carassius gibelio). Photo credit to: Esra Baycelebi.

Of these, marine species are by far the most prevalent, with 198 classified as strictly marine, followed by 42 terrestrial and 27 freshwater species. This trend reflects Türkiye’s extensive coastlines along the Black, Aegean, and Mediterranean seas, which offer vast ecological niches.

Furthermore, the coastal regions, characterized by dense populations, robust economies, and intensive trade networks, create multiple human-mediated pathways that can facilitate the introduction and establishment of non-native species.

Number of established species in each administrative area of Türkiye based on GBIF records. Gray areas represent administrative areas without non-native species based on GBIF. The marine area represents the Exclusive Economic Zone (extracted from Marine Regions marineregions.org, Flanders Marine Institute 2023). Credit to Tarkan et al., 2026.

The assessment also revealed a clear west-to-east gradient, with non-native species concentrated in the western part of the country and decreasing toward the east. The highest concentrations were found in Kayseri and Muğla, each hosting 37 established species, followed closely by Antalya with 34.

In terms of biogeographic distribution, nearly half of the established species originated from the Indo-Malayan realm, followed by the Australasian realm.

A significant concern raised by the researchers is the substantial impact gap in national reporting. Specifically, the majority of established non-native species in Türkiye had no reported impacts (n = 224; 83%), although this number decreased to 157 (59%) at the global scale.

Doughnut plot indicating the species by (a) impacts and (b) impact mechanisms. Credit to Tarkan et al., 2026.

While only 17% of established species currently have documented impacts within Türkiye, 41% of these same species are known to cause impact elsewhere.

These findings suggest that many species in Türkiye have not yet undergone formal impact assessments. Among those with known effects, ecological and environmental damages were the most frequently cited, primarily driven by biological mechanisms such as competition, predation, and rapid growth.

The outlook for species already established in Türkiye is particularly concerning. Currently, 50% of the 62 species screened using the Aquatic Species Invasiveness Screening Kit pose a high to very high risk of invasiveness. These proportions are projected to exceed 60% under future climate warming scenarios.

Coordinated national efforts will be essential to mitigate the long-term impacts on Türkiye’s biodiversity and ecosystems.

the researchers conclude

The study therefore underscores the urgent need for systematic monitoring, improved impact assessments, and climate-informed risk management strategies.

Original source:

Tarkan AS, Yapıcı S, Kurtul I, Błońska D, Vilizzi L, Baş Sermenli H, Farooq S, Aldemir C, Uçma Uysal T, Giannetto D, Bilge G, Çiftçioğlu M, Najafi-Majd E, Aktay-Sözüer L, Kaya C, Bayçelebi E, Aydın İ, Haubrock PJ, Briski E, Soto I (2026) The first national assessment of established non-native species in Türkiye. NeoBiota 105: 297-317. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.105.176362

How are invasive fish entering the Mediterranean Sea?

A new study explores how shipping, currents and habitat factors carry alien species through the Suez Canal.

In 1869, the construction of the Suez Canal was completed, connecting two marine regions previously separated for 16 million years and initiating major ecological changes that continue to this day.

Now more than 100 fish species native to the Indo-West Pacific Ocean – including the ‘devil firefish’ – have crossed to become established in the Mediterranean Sea.

But how do they make the journey?

Researchers from the American University of Beirut and the American University in Dubai analysed how invasive fish from the Indo-Pacific region colonise the Mediterranean. Combining ocean current modelling, shipping data, and environmental analysis, they examined records of 136 fish species to map the natural and human-driven factors that enable these invaders to thrive.

Location of the Suez Canal.

Published in NeoBiota, the findings indicate that the primary drivers for the initial entry of invasive fish into the Mediterranean are proximity to the Suez Canal and sea currents transporting fish larvae into nearby eastern Mediterranean regions. However, while sea currents play an important role early in the invasion stage, they cannot explain how species cross into the western Mediterranean.

Indeed, cargo shipping has become increasingly influential, with focal points like Malta acting as key stepping stones for the spread of non-native fish, especially to western Mediterranean areas. Over time, the odds of a region being colonised via shipping have grown significantly.

A ship passing through the Suez Canal in Egypt.

Additionally, local conditions such as high salinity in Mediterranean waters boost the likelihood of invasive species establishing permanent populations, as these fish tend to be pre-adapted to saline environments from their native habitats.

“Scientists have long suspected that the anti-clockwise spread of invasive species in the eastern Mediterranean is due to currents and the high number of first records in Malta is due to shipping.

“Our use of sea current simulations and shipping data could confirm these conjectures and provide quantitative estimates of the effects.”

Heinrich zu Dohna, lead author of the paper.

Logistic regression models indicate that  in some regions shipping leads to a sixfold increase of the odds of receiving invasive species,  indicating targeted management and monitoring is needed at major shipping hubs.

Better data on ballast water release and ship movements in the Mediterranean are needed, as cargo shipping’s impact on biological invasions is now clear. Malta’s role as a major shipping hub makes it a particular hotspot for secondary introductions and warrants special attention by policymakers and marine managers.

Original source

zu Dohna H, Lakkis I, Bariche M (2025) The spread of Indo-Pacific origin fish species in the Mediterranean Sea is influenced by sea currents, habitat factors, and increasingly by shipping. NeoBiota 101: 73-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.101.157775

Follow NeoBiota on Bluesky and Facebook.

Australian winged wētā population in Auckland increasing, posing a threat to native invertebrates

In a peer-reviewed study published in the Journal of Orthoptera Research, the insect has been traced back to its origin in Queensland.

A fearsome-looking insect commonly referred to as “winged wētā” may look like a flying wētā, but it is not a wētā at all. It belongs to the family of the raspy crickets, which is not native to New Zealand. Like all of its family members, it has the ability to secrete silk from its mouth parts, which it uses to build shelters in foliage.

A close-up photo of a brown cricket resting on a green fern leaf.
Adult male winged wētā (Pterapotrechus salomonoides) in its natural habitat. Photo by Danilo Hegg

The “winged wētā” was first detected in Auckland in 1990. Within thirty years, it had expanded its range north to Cable Bay, Northland; east to Coromandel Peninsula, and south to Raglan, Waikato. While sightings in New Zealand became more and more numerous, the insect remained unidentified. New Zealand entomologist Danilo Hegg recently travelled to Queensland, Australia, to trace the “winged wētā” back to its population of origin and put a name to the species. In a peer-reviewed study now published in the Journal of Orthoptera Research, Hegg showed that the insect originates from the montane rainforests south of Brisbane, at the border of Queensland and New South Wales.

A map of Australia and New Zealand highlighting specific locations in Queensland and New South Wales, including Brisbane, Tamborine Mountain, and Auckland.
Collection localities in New Zealand and Australia.

“The insect is heavily built, has relatively short wings, and is a poor flyer,” says Hegg. “While Australian butterflies do occasionally reach our shores carried by westerly winds, the 2,300km journey across the Tasman Sea is almost certainly too much for the winged wētā. It is highly unlikely that it would have reached New Zealand by natural means”. Australian insects carried by the wind may land anywhere between Cape Reinga and Rakiura / Stewart Island. The fact that the “winged wētā” was first detected in Auckland, New Zealand’s largest import hub, only adds weight to the hypothesis of an accidental introduction by anthropogenic means.

Not only has the “winged wētā” been expanding its range in New Zealand; it has also been building up numbers. Its population density has at least quintupled in Auckland during the past twelve years. And like many other invasive species, it appears to be found in higher numbers in its new territory than in its country of origin. “In Queensland, I could spend a night out and find one or two individuals at most. In Auckland, I was able to capture seven specimens in a two-hour walk” says Hegg.

A photo of two crickets nestled together inside curled green leaves.
Nymphs of winged wētā (Pterapotrechus salomonoides) in rolled leaves held together by silk strands

The “winged wētā” is an omnivore and an agile hunter. Strictly nocturnal, it prowls in the foliage in trees and pounces on any invertebrate that is small enough for it to tackle. Observations conducted in captivity and in the wild have shown that the “winged wētā” preys on just about anything that moves at night. Including juvenile Auckland tree wētā, one of New Zealand’s largest insects.

A close-up photo of a brown cricket resting on a green leaf and holding insect wings in its mandibles.
A winged wētā (Pterapotrechus salomonoides) Nymph with winged termite (Schedorhinotermes sp.) prey.

Given its high population density and its predatory habits, there are concerns the invasive insect could have an impact on New Zealand’s native invertebrate wildlife. “There is still a lot we don’t know” says Hegg “we need to study its diet in the wild, and we need to understand whether the winged wētā is also taking hold in intact native forest habitats, or only in urbanised areas, where the majority of the sightings are. But it poses a threat that needs to be taken seriously”.

New Zealand’s invertebrates are already being decimanted by introduced rodents, mustelids, hedgehogs, cats and wasps. The Australian winged wētā is only going to add to their woes.

Research article:

Hegg D (2025) An Australian raspy cricket established in New Zealand, Pterapotrechus salomonoides (Orthoptera, Gryllacrididae), with notes on ecology and first description of the male. Journal of Orthoptera Research 34(1): 77-94. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.34.134391

Pensoft joins new Horizon Europe project to help tackle terrestrial invasive alien species

Pensoft will play a vital role in public awareness, engagement and promoting effective strategies for monitoring and managing IAS.

The Chinese muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) is an invasive alien species for Europe with established populations across the western part of the continent. Photo by Mario Shimbov (Pensoft).

As one of the partners in charge of maximising the project’s impact, Pensoft will work on OneSTOP’s visual branding, communication, dissemination and exploitation, and the development of a data management plan for the project. 

Invasive alien species (IAS) pose one of the most significant threats to global biodiversity, contributing to species extinctions, ecosystem degradation, and economic losses exceeding $400 billion annually

To tackle this, the EU enforces Regulation (EU) 1143/2014 and the Biodiversity Strategy for 2030, aiming to prevent IAS introduction, enhance early detection, and manage their spread. Member States coordinate efforts with scientific support and citizen engagement to minimise their impact and protect Europe’s biodiversity. Addressing this urgent challenge, the EU Horizon project OneSTOP has officially launched as part of a coordinated European effort to combat biological invasions in terrestrial environments.

Comprehensive Approach to Tackling Invasive Alien Species

OneSTOP is one of two ambitious projects funded under the Horizon Europe programme, the other being GuardIAS, which focuses on marine and freshwater habitats. The two collaborative initiatives held their joint official kick-off meeting in January at the Joint Research Centre in Ispra, Italy. Together, these projects aim to develop innovative solutions for detecting, preventing, and managing invasive alien species across all ecosystem realms.

Coordinated by Dr Quentin Groom from Meise Botanic Garden, Belgium, and Prof Helen Roy from the UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, OneSTOP will integrate advanced scientific research, cutting-edge detection technologies, and policy-driven strategies to enhance biosecurity across Europe. 

The ОneSTOP project consortium at the project’s kick-off meeting held on 20-24 January 2025 in Ispra, Italy.
The project is structured around four key objectives:
  1. Improve species detection and response time by incorporating computer vision, environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis and citizen science initiatives.
  2. Facilitate swift action against invasive species threats by openly sharing data in international standards for biodiversity data with stakeholders who need it.
  3. Support policy-makers in making informed decisions about where and how to allocate resources for invasive species management by developing data-driven systems.
  4. Ensure stakeholder collaboration and knowledge exchange by implementing Living Labs at the regional level and an international policy forum, thereby encouraging socio-political action.

OneSTOP aligns with the European Alien Species Information Network (EASIN) mission to protect EU biodiversity by improving IAS management through advanced biosecurity technologies and enhanced data integration. By fostering collaboration with the Joint Research Centre (JRC) and supporting Member States with innovative tools, the project strengthens the EU’s capacity to detect, respond to, and mitigate IAS threats in line with existing regulations.

Pensoft’s role in OneSTOP

As the leader of Work Package 1, Pensoft is responsible for shaping OneSTOP’s visual identity and developing a comprehensive strategy for communication, dissemination, and impact. This includes crafting a data and knowledge management plan to ensure the project’s findings are effectively shared and utilised. By fostering collaboration with key biosecurity networks, these efforts will strengthen OneSTOP’s long-term influence.

A key part of this work is to raise awareness about invasive alien species (IAS) and their pathways, ensuring that policymakers, researchers, and the public understand their impact and the importance of prevention. Pensoft will contribute to translating complex scientific findings into accessible content—including infographics, policy briefs, and interactive visualisations—to engage policymakers, researchers, and the public. These efforts will ensure that IAS knowledge is effectively shared, fostering collaboration and informed decision-making across sectors. Knowledge transfer materials will be shared through various channels, including OneSTOP’s five Living Labs across Europe, where stakeholders will be actively engaged in outreach and citizen science initiatives.

Pensoft will play a vital role in strengthening public awareness, fostering engagement, and promoting effective strategies for monitoring and managing IAS.

International Consortium

The project brings together twenty international partners from fifteen countries operating in various sectors, ultimately contributing with diverse expertise:

  1. Meise Botanic Garden – Belgium
  2. Aarhus University – Denmark
  3. UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology – United Kingdom
  4. Biopolis – Portugal
  5. Coventry University – United Kingdom
  6. The Cyprus Institute – Cyprus
  7. Research Institute for Nature and Forest – Belgium
  8. Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences – Czech Republic
  9. Lincoln University – New Zealand
  10. Platform Kinetics – United Kingdom
  11. Pensoft Publishers – Bulgaria
  12. Stellenbosch University – South Africa
  13. University of Exeter – United Kingdom
  14. University of Vienna – Austria
  15. Greenformation – Hungary
  16. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – Germany
  17. Ovidius University of Constanta – Romania
  18. Natural Resources Institute Finland – Finland
  19. The Binary Forest – Belgium
  20. Experimental Station of Arid Areas of the Spanish National Research Council – Spain

For more information, visit the OneSTOP project website, and make sure to follow the project’s progress via our social media channels on BlueSky and LinkedIn.

The human dimensions of biological invasions – involving stakeholders in addressing invasive species

Can the knowledge and experience of recreational anglers in Iceland help us understand how far the invasive flounder has spread in the country?

Guest blog post by Theresa Henke

For centuries, all kinds of species have been transported by humans around the globe, allowing them to cross the boundaries of their native range and settle in new ecosystems. Over the past decades the numbers of these introduced species and the impacts they cause have been continuously increasing. Biological invasions nowadays represent one of the biggest threats to biodiversity worldwide.

Humans are and have always been an essential part of biological invasions and in order to fully understand the issue and how to tackle it, we need to understand and include the human dimensions in our research.

My research on European flounder in Iceland began in 2017 when I was writing my Master’s thesis. The flounder is a flatfish species that had been officially documented in the country since 1999 but not much was known on its impacts. In my thesis I looked at the flounder through ecological lenses, trying to identify how the presence of the flounder affects other species. Living in a small community in the Westfjords of Iceland during this time, I got to meet many local people who shared their personal stories, experiences and knowledge with me in every-day conversations. I truly enjoyed these conversations and learning about the species I study from different perspectives beyond the academic settings. These exchanges sparked my interest in exploring the human dimensions of biological invasions and, looking back, have really shaped my academic path going forward.

Theresa Henke holding a flounder.

In our recently published NeoBiota study “Have you seen this fish? – Important contribution of stakeholder observations in documenting the distribution and spread of an alien fish species in Iceland” we wanted to explore how the knowledge and experience of recreational anglers in Iceland can help us understand how far the flounder has spread in Iceland. The flounder in Iceland had only received little scientific interest before and the available information was limited and scattered between different institutions and scientists. Recreational anglers, on the other hand, who chase after native salmon, trout, and char in the Icelandic rivers and lakes, often encounter the flounder.

A net full of flounder.

In 2019, we asked anglers in Iceland to take part in an online survey, where we asked them different questions about the flounder, including where in Iceland they have seen or caught it. We then compared locations named by anglers to the locations that were available from different databases of the Marine and Freshwater Research Institute of Iceland. The locations we received included data collected during scientific surveys and research projects done by the institute as well as observations that were reported to the institute by the public (mostly recreational anglers and commercial fishermen).

Our goal was to evaluate whether observations made by stakeholders, in this case the recreational angling community in Iceland, could be a good source of additional information for monitoring of an alien fish species. Collecting information on the distribution and spread of an alien species is a very important step in addressing biological invasions but is often underdeveloped because not enough resources (i.e. money, time, scientists…) are made available.

Theresa Henke holding a 43-cm flounder in Eyjafjörður.

We have shown that neither source offers a perfect solution to the monitoring of the flounder in Iceland. But we show that each of the sources has their own advantages and disadvantages and by combining them, we are able to get a much clearer picture of where in Iceland the flounder currently occurs and how fast it spread in the early years. Information that was shared by stakeholders, whether it was in our study or to the databases of the Marine and Freshwater Research Institute, played a big role in better understanding the flounder in Iceland.  

The interactions with the recreational angling community in Iceland during my PhD have taught me a lot about the flounder in Iceland but even more about my own approach to science. I think as scientists, we should more often take a step outside of our academic bubble and take a look at the issue we are studying from the perspectives of the public and other stakeholders. In the case of biological invasions, we can learn a lot from those who are directly confronted by an invasive species, regardless of whether they have a scientific degree or not.

Research article:

Henke T, Bárðarson H, Thorlacius M, Ólafsdóttir GA (2025) Have you seen this fish? Important contribution of stakeholder observations in documenting the distribution and spread of an alien fish species in Iceland. NeoBiota 97: 67-90. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.97.132365

Assessing the impact of invasive plants on ecosystems: a new framework

By combining several new advancements, the framework will aid in the management of plant invasions.

Invasive plant species pose a major threat to biodiversity and ecosystem health worldwide. However, predicting the exact impact of these invasions is challenging due to the complexity of interactions between invading species, native communities, and impacted ecosystems.

To combat this issue, researchers from the University of Freiburg and Justus Liebig University Giessen have developed a framework to better assess the impact of invasive plant species on ecosystems.

Outlined in a study published in the open-access journal NeoBiota, the framework combines new technologies and techniques to learn and predict how invasive plants alter ecosystems over time and in different environments.

Animated model visualisation of spatial-temporal dynamics of invader impacts. Click here to download a detailed explanation of the model.

The new framework integrates several modern advancements:

Environmental mapping: Progress in remote sensing and ecological monitoring allow researchers to capture detailed information about the environmental conditions of invaded areas. Drones, satellites, and advanced sensory networks can be used to create detailed ecosystem maps, which show how invasive species interact with their environment.

Functional tracers: These are specific indicators that reflect changes in ecosystem functions caused by invasive species. For example, researchers can track the impact of nitrogen-fixing invasive plants on ecosystems using nitrogen isotopes.

Spatio-temporal modelling: By combining environmental data with new modelling techniques, such as AI, researchers can create detailed models showing the spread and impact of invasive species on ecosystems over time. Such models can predict how changes in environmental conditions, such as climate change, might influence an invasive species’ success.

Infographic showing the mechanisms that determine the impact of invasive plants on ecosystems.
Mechanisms determining plant invasion impact.

Beyond scientific analysis, novel technologies also facilitate communication of ecological impacts, as the authors demonstrate in an animated 3D-video visualisation.

“The framework we’ve introduced offers researchers deeper insights into how invasive plant species interact with their environments, enabling more targeted management to lessen their ecological impact. We advocate for stronger collaboration between ecologists and technical experts to refine and expand these methods.

“Going forward, further research and integration of the wide range of recent methods and tools are needed to enhance the framework’s effectiveness.”

The research team behind the new framework: Christiane Werner, Christine Hellmann and André Große-Stoltenberg.

Original source

Werner C, Hellmann C, Große-Stoltenberg A (2024) An integrative framework to assess the spatio-temporal impact of plant invasion on ecosystem functioning. NeoBiota 94: 225-242. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.94.126714

Follow NeoBiota on X and Facebook.

The silent invasion: how termites threaten homes worldwide

As climate patterns shift, global cities may soon find themselves under siege by these tiny yet destructive pests.

As climate change continues its relentless march, the world faces not only rising temperatures and extreme weather, but also an insidious threat to our homes: invasive termites. And the bill could be steep – invasive termites currently cost over 40 billion USD annually.

In a new study published in the open-access journal Neobiota, PhD student Edouard Duquesne and Professor Denis Fournier from the Evolutionary Biology & Ecology lab (Université libre de Bruxelles) unveil the unsettling reality of invasive termites’ potential expansion into new territories.

Their research reveals that as temperatures rise and climate patterns shift, cities worldwide, from tropical hotspots like Miami, Sao Paulo, Lagos, Jakarta or Darwin to temperate metropolises like Paris, Brussels, London, New York or Tokyo, could soon find themselves under siege by these tiny yet destructive pests.

A man with a headtorch inspects the damages caused by Coptotermes gestroi termites on a house wall.
Adolfo Cuadrado, a termite infestation specialist at Anticimex, meticulously inspects the damages caused by Coptotermes gestroi on a house wall. © David Mora: https://www.pasiontermitas.com.

But how do termites, typically associated with tropical climates, find their way into cities far beyond their natural habitat? The answer lies in the interconnectedness of our modern world. Urbanisation, with its dense populations and bustling trade networks, provides the perfect breeding ground for termite invasions.

Moreover, the global movement of goods, including wooden furniture transported by private vessels, offers unsuspecting pathways for these silent invaders to hitch a ride into our homes.

“A solitary termite colony, nestled within a small piece of wood, could clandestinely voyage from the West Indies to your Cannes apartment. It might lurk within furniture aboard a yacht moored at the Cannes Film Festival marina.”

“Mating is coming. Termite queens and kings, attracted by lights, may initiate reproduction, laying the groundwork for new colonies to conquer dry land.”

Researchers Edouard Duquesne and Denis Fournier.

Duquesne and Fournier’s research emphasises the need for a paradigm shift in how we approach invasive species modelling. By integrating connectivity variables like trade, transport, and population density, their study highlights the importance of understanding the intricate interactions that facilitate termite spread.

Workers and soldiers of the invasive termite Reticulitermes.
Workers and soldiers of the invasive termite Reticulitermes. © David Mora: https://www.pasiontermitas.com.

In light of these findings, the researchers urge swift action from policymakers and citizens alike. Major cities, regardless of their climate zone, must implement strict termite control measures to protect homes and infrastructure.

“Citizens can play a crucial role by leveraging technology, such as AI-assisted apps like iNaturalist, to detect and report potential termite sightings, turning ordinary residents into vigilant guardians of their environment,” say the researchers.

“As we confront the challenges of a rapidly changing climate, awareness and proactive measures are our best defence against the creeping menace of invasive termites,” they conclude.

Original source

Duquesne E, Fournier D (2024) Connectivity and climate change drive the global distribution of highly invasive termites. NeoBiota 92: 281-314. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.92.115411

Follow NeoBiota on X and Facebook.

Melting glaciers provide new ground for invasive species

A case study on the island of South Georgia.

Invasive species spread through human activities are one of the main causes of the ongoing biodiversity crisis.

Even on South Georgia, a remote island located in the very south of the Atlantic Ocean, exotic species are present. Many of which were inadvertently introduced by whalers and sealers in the 19th and early 20th century.

The invasive carabid ground beetle, Merizodus soledadinus, is present on sites that have been recently exposed by melting glaciers.

In a new study published in the open-access journal Neobiota and funded by Darwin Plus, researchers explored how living organisms colonise new ground provided by melting glaciers.

Like other cold regions of the world, South Georgia is losing its glaciers because of climate change, leaving behind large areas of newly uncovered bare ground.

Invasive annual meadow grass colonising ground only a few years after the glacier disappeared.
Invasive annual meadow grass colonising ground only a few years after the glacier disappeared.

Researchers surveyed the foreland biodiversity of six glaciers, creating an inventory of the flora and fauna that colonise forelands at different stages of glacial retreat.

A survey site near a former whaling station (Grytviken).
A survey site near a former whaling station (Grytviken).

They found that, just a few years after bare ground is exposed by a glacier melting, pioneer plants arrive, progressively covering more ground with time, followed by an increasing number of species.

Rocky terrain by Glacier Col.

Native and exotic plants, as well as invertebrates, take advantage of this opportunity. Surprisingly, two temperate plant species from the Northern Hemisphere, annual meadow grass and mouse-ear chickweed, colonise sites faster than any other species.

The team suggests their results indicate invasive species will likely spread on South Georgia as fast as glaciers are retreating. Whether this has or will have negative consequences on local species needs to be investigated to help protect this unique ecosystem.

Original Source

Tichit P, Brickle P, Newton RJ, Convey P, Dawson W (2024) Introduced species infiltrate recent stages of succession after glacial retreat on sub-Antarctic South Georgia. NeoBiota 92: 85-110. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.92.117226

Follow NeoBiota on X and Facebook.

Listen to the trees: a detective work on the origin of invasive species

An attempt to explore the history of the spread of four non-indigenous invasive tree species in one of the most important Hungarian forest-steppe forests of high conservation value.

Guest blog post by Arnold Erdélyi, Judit Hartdégen, Ákos Malatinszky, and Csaba Vadász

Today, almost everyone is familiar with the term “biological invasion”. Countless studies have been carried out to describe the various processes, and explore the cause and effect, and several methods have been developed in order to control certain invasive species. However, one of the biggest puzzles is always the question of how it all happened. It is not always easy to answer, and, in general, the smaller the area, the more difficult or even impossible it is to answer. In the course of our work, we attempted to explore the history of the spread of four, non-indigenous invasive tree species in one of the most important Hungarian forest-steppe forests of high conservation value, the Peszér Forest (approximately 1000 ha). Last week, we published our study in the journal One Ecosystem.

The Far Eastern tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima), as well as the North American black cherry (Prunus serotina), the box elder (Acer negundo) and the common hackberry (Celtis occidentalis) are among the worst invasive plant species in Hungary. They are also responsible for serious conservation and economic problems in the Peszér Forest.

Invasion of tree of heaven (top left) and common hackberry (top right) in poplar stands, carpet of seedlings of black cherry (bottom left), and monodominant stand of box elder, regrown from stump after cutting (bottom right)

Historical reconstructions of the spread of invasive species are most often based on only one, or sometimes a few aspects. We used six approaches simultaneously:

  • we reviewed the published and grey literature,
  • extracted tree species data from the National Forest Database since 1958,
  • conducted a field survey with full spatial coverage (16,000 survey units (25×25 m quadrats)) – instead of sampling,
  • recorded all the largest (and presumably the oldest) individuals for annual ring counts,
  • performed hotspot analyses on the field data
  • collected local knowledge.
Cutting down the oldest common hackberry trees in order to count the annual rings from trunk discs

Our results show that each approach provided some new information, and without any of them the story revealed would have been much shorter and more uncertain. We have also highlighted that at the local level, the use of one or two aspects can be not only inadequate but also misleading.

From the literature it was possible to determine the exact place and date of the first occurrence of the tree of heaven and the black cherry. However, in the case of black cherry, for example, it was only possible to piece together the circumstances of the first plantings by combining three different sources. The first occurrences of box elder were found in forestry data. Finally, in the case of the common hackberry, searching for old individuals and determining their age gave the best results.

Common hackberry in the Peszér forest according to the recent forestry data (2016) and the field survey (2017-2019). The difference is clear: in the official forestry database, the tree species is underrepresented several times over

A well-explored story of a biological invasion can go a long way in making more and more people understand that controlling these non-indigenous species can only be beneficial. On the other hand, it can also help to strengthen conservation efforts, for example by increasing the volunteer workforce, which can be a major factor in the reduction of certain species. We hope that our work and the approaches we have taken will serve as a good model for exploring other invasion stories around the world.

Winter snapshot from the Peszér Forest, a diverse forest edge habitat along an inner road.

Research article:

Erdélyi A, Hartdégen J, Malatinszky Á, Vadász C (2023) Historical reconstruction of the invasions of four non-native tree species at local scale: a detective work on Ailanthus altissima, Celtis occidentalis, Prunus serotina and Acer negundo. One Ecosystem 8: e108683. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.8.e108683